On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 09:49:00AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Yes, you are right here. I missed the parts before
> mock_scram_secret() gets called and there are comments in the whole
> area. Hmm, at the end of the day, I think that would just have
> verify_client_proof() fill in logdetail when the client proof does not
> match, and use a wording different than what's proposed upthread to
> outline that this is a client proof mismatch.
Seeing no updates, this has been marked as RwF.
--
Michael