Re: SQL-standard function body

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: SQL-standard function body
Дата
Msg-id YG54YggzyPrTFE+e@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: SQL-standard function body  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: SQL-standard function body
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 04:22:17PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Buildfarm suggests this has some issues under force_parallel_mode.
> I'm wondering about missed fields in outfuncs/readfuncs, or the like.

The problem looks a bit more fundamental to me, as there seems to be
some confusion with the concept of what should be the query string
when it comes to prosqlbody with a parallel run, as it replaces prosrc
in some cases where the function uses SQL as language.  If the
buildfarm cannot be put back to green, could it be possible to revert
this patch?
--
Michael

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Feature improvement: can we add queryId for pg_catalog.pg_stat_activity view?
Следующее
От: Amit Langote
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ModifyTable overheads in generic plans