On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 11:27:28PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 10:23:30PM -0600, Kenneth Marshall wrote:
>> +1 I know that it has been deprecated, but it can be very useful when
>> working with data from pre-deprecation. :) It is annoying to have to
>> resort to plperl or plpython because it is not available. The lack or
>> orthogonality is painful.
plperl and plpython can be annoying to require if you have strong
security requirements as these are untrusted languages, but I don't
completely agree with this argument because pgcrypto gives the option
to use SHA1 with digest(), and this one is fine to have even in
environments under STIG or equally-constrained environments.
> Yes, I think having SHA1 makes sense --- there are probably still valid
> uses for it.
Consistency with the existing in-core SQL functions for cryptohashes
and the possibility to not need pgcrypto are my only arguments at
hand.
;)
--
Michael