On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 09:42:19AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Ok, that sounds reasonable, but the cfbot doesn't like patches that
> depend on other patches in a different email. Maybe you can roll this up
> as an extra patch in your next version? It's pretty small.
This can go two ways if both of you agree, by sending an updated patch
on this thread based on the other one.. And actually, Jelte's patch
has less C code than this thread's proposal, eventhough it lacks
tests.
--
Michael