On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 01:15:40PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Is this something you want to follow up on, since you were involved in that
> patch? Is the redundant assignment simply to be deleted, or do you want to
> check the original patch again for context?
Most of the changes of this thread have been applied as of c42cd05c.
Remains the SIGALRM business with sig_atomic_t, and I wanted to check
that by myself first.
--
Michael