Re: Getting rid of SQLValueFunction

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: Getting rid of SQLValueFunction
Дата
Msg-id Y3mYbQMzqd0pBpjU@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Getting rid of SQLValueFunction  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Ответы Re: Getting rid of SQLValueFunction  (Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 10:23:58AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Please note that in order to avoid tweaks when choosing the attribute
> name of function call, this needs a total of 8 new catalog functions
> mapping to the SQL keywords, which is what the test added by 2e0d80c
> is about:
> - current_role
> - user
> - current_catalog
> - current_date
> - current_time
> - current_timestamp
> - localtime
> - localtimestamp
>
> Any objections?

Hearing nothing, I have gone through 0001 again and applied it as
fb32748 to remove the dependency between names and SQLValueFunction.
Attached is 0002, to bring back the CI to a green state.
--
Michael

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Joe Conway
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgsql: Fix typos and bump catversion.
Следующее
От: Thomas Munro
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: More efficient build farm animal wakeup?