Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От hubert depesz lubaczewski
Тема Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
Дата
Msg-id Y3JBktH7QS0fVOL5@depesz.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-bugs
Дерево обсуждения 
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 06:41:59PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> From the last two lines above, it is clear why it started working. The
> restart_lsn has advanced from 1039D/83825958 to 1039D/9170B010 which
> means the system no longer needs data from 000000010001039D00000083.

Sure, but how could it advance if the wal wasn't there?

Best regards,

depesz

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
Следующее
От: hubert depesz lubaczewski
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.