Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects
Дата
Msg-id Y0ZVk5ILZqYKEL+Z@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 04:34:07PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 04:29:10PM -0700, Jacob Champion wrote:
>> To clarify, I agree that pg_dump should contain the core fix. What I'm
>> questioning is the addition of --dump-options to make use of that fix
>> from pg_upgrade, since it also lets the user do "exciting" new things
>> like --exclude-schema and --include-foreign-data and so on. I don't
>> think we should let them do that without a good reason.
>
> Ah, yes, I think that is a fair point.

It has been more than four weeks since the last activity of this
thread and there has been what looks like some feedback to me, so
marked as RwF for the time being.
--
Michael

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: meson PGXS compatibility
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Allow pageinspect's bt_page_stats function to return a set of rows instead of a single row