On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 01:05:04PM +0300, Pavel Luzanov wrote:
> On 15.02.2023 10:11, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Which comes down to blame me for both of them.
>
> My only intention was to make postgres better.I'm sorry you took it that
> way.
You have no need to feel sorry about that. I really appreciate that
you took the time to report this issue, so don't worry. My point is
that I have committed this code, so basically it is my responsibility
to take care of its maintenance.
>> So, please find attached a patch to close the gap the sample files,
>> for both things, with descriptions of all the field values they can
>> use.
>
> A short and precise description. Nothing to add.Next time I will try to
> offer a patch at once.
If you have a proposal of patch, that's always nice to have, but you
should not feel obliged to do so, either.
Thanks a lot for the report, Pavel!
--
Michael