Re: Adding "large" to PG_TEST_EXTRA

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Stephen Frost
Тема Re: Adding "large" to PG_TEST_EXTRA
Дата
Msg-id Y+qFVfiwWAMFj6Iy@tamriel.snowman.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Adding "large" to PG_TEST_EXTRA  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: Adding "large" to PG_TEST_EXTRA  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Greetings,

* Andres Freund (andres@anarazel.de) wrote:
> I'm working on rebasing [1], my patch to make relation extension scale
> better.
>
> As part of that I'd like to add tests for relation extension. To be able to
> test the bulk write strategy path, we need to have a few backends concurrently
> load > 16MB files.
>
> It seems pretty clear that doing that on all buildfarm machines wouldn't be
> nice / welcome. And it also seems likely that this won't be the last case
> where that'd be useful.
>
> So I'd like to add a 'large' class to PG_TEST_EXTRA, that we can use in tests
> that we only want to execute on machines with sufficient resources.
>
> Makes sense?

+1 in general.  Are there existing tests that we should add into that
set that you're thinking of..?  I've been working with the Kerberos
tests and that's definitely one that seems to fit this description...

Thanks,

Stephen

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Adding "large" to PG_TEST_EXTRA
Следующее
От: Justin Pryzby
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Making Vars outer-join aware