Re: Why the current setup of pgsql.* and comp.databases.postresql.general are BROKEN

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Woodchuck Bill
Тема Re: Why the current setup of pgsql.* and comp.databases.postresql.general are BROKEN
Дата
Msg-id Xns95ADC2E153BA7bswr607h4@130.133.1.4
обсуждение исходный текст
Список pgsql-general
Gary L. Burnore <gburnore@databasix.com> wrote in
news:co8frd$ktk$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:

> I'm posting to a USENet group.  I shouldn't be receiving an email from
> the list.  If the groups had been generated as MODERATED newsgroups,
> my post wouldn't hit MY spool, then go to HIS server for some
> approval, later to appear a second time and AFTER I receive this
> STUPID message in email.
>
> Of course, he doesn't CARE.

Just think about how easy it would be for a forging troll to mailbomb
anyone he wanted to by flooding the newsgroup with posts under the victim's
spoofed e-mail address. This system is too vulnerable to abuse. The groups
should be moderated, for one. Second, Marc needs to decide whether he wants
the groups to be in pgsql.*, *or* comp.* ... not both. The lists and gating
methods should all be explained in detail on the final RFD, so they appear
on the CFV.

--
Bill

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Konstantin Danilov
Дата:
Сообщение: ...
Следующее
От: Woodchuck Bill
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: comp.databases.postgresql.* groups and RFD