Re: Postgres Pain Points 2 ruby / node language drivers

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andreas Joseph Krogh
Тема Re: Postgres Pain Points 2 ruby / node language drivers
Дата
Msg-id VisenaEmail.ca.1e1a8beafe4b846e.1567e0bc660@tc7-visena
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Postgres Pain Points 2 ruby / node language drivers  (Chris Travers <chris.travers@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
Дерево обсуждения
På fredag 12. august 2016 kl. 11:07:08, skrev Chris Travers <chris.travers@gmail.com>:
[snip]
My preference is stored procedures plus service locators, to be honest.  It enables a degree of loose coupling and even dynamic discovery that ORMs are generally not well suited to.
 
But I think the difference may be bigger.  ORMs make sense when you want a database for your application.  They break down badly when you want an application for your database.  Usually I tend to want the latter.
 
 
I'm in the first group, and I think many are when evaluating ORMs or having an opinion about them. Being in the latter, I more understand you concerns.
 
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
CTO / Partner - Visena AS
Mobile: +47 909 56 963
 
Вложения

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Andrus"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: How to parse xml containing optional elements
Следующее
От: Daevor The Devoted
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Postgres Pain Points 2 ruby / node language drivers