Sv: Re: Oracle vs PG
| От | Andreas Joseph Krogh |
|---|---|
| Тема | Sv: Re: Oracle vs PG |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | VisenaEmail.74.f8747b02b8d5321a.166a2d78056@tc7-visena обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Oracle vs PG (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Sv: Re: Oracle vs PG
Re: Oracle vs PG |
| Список | pgsql-general |
På tirsdag 23. oktober 2018 kl. 22:45:36, skrev Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>:
On 10/23/18 12:58 PM, Ravi Krishna wrote:
> Well it is Aurora.
>
> https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/23/amazon-move-off-oracle-caused-prime-day-outage-in-warehouse.html
>
Since the article was almost content-free I not would use it on either
side of the argument. The only thing I pulled from it was Amazon changed
databases and hit the learning curve. That will happen in either direction.
Is it so hard to accept commercial databases have advantages?
I find that not one bit surprising.
I've used PG since 90's and it's no secret the "big guys" beat PG on certain workloads.
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: