Re: Poor performance when deleting from entity-attribute-value type master-table
От | Andreas Joseph Krogh |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Poor performance when deleting from entity-attribute-value type master-table |
Дата | |
Msg-id | VisenaEmail.71.c67d5354b8430fbc.14b704873bd@tc7-visena обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Poor performance when deleting from entity-attribute-value type master-table (Igor Neyman <ineyman@perceptron.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
From: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Andreas Joseph Krogh
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2015 4:13 PM
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: [PERFORM] Poor performance when deleting from entity-attribute-value type master-table
Hi all.
Using PG-9.4.0 I'm seeing this trying to delete from an "entity"-master table:
*# explain analyze delete from onp_crm_entity where entity_id IN (select tmp.delivery_id from temp_delete_delivery_id tmp);
QUERY PLAN
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Delete on onp_crm_entity (cost=0.43..5673.40 rows=1770 width=12) (actual time=7.370..7.370 rows=0 loops=1)
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.43..5673.40 rows=1770 width=12) (actual time=0.050..1.374 rows=108 loops=1)
-> Seq Scan on temp_delete_delivery_id tmp (cost=0.00..27.70 rows=1770 width=14) (actual time=0.014..0.080 rows=108 loops=1)
-> Index Scan using onp_crm_entity_pkey on onp_crm_entity (cost=0.43..3.18 rows=1 width=14) (actual time=0.010..0.011 rows=1 loops=108)
Index Cond: (entity_id = tmp.delivery_id)
Planning time: 0.314 ms
Trigger for constraint onp_crm_activity_entity_id_fkey: time=4.141 calls=108Trigger for constraint ...
Trigger for constraint ...
Trigger for constraint ...
I have lots of tables referencing onp_crm_entity(entity_id) so I expect the poor performance of deleting from it is caused by all the triggers firing to check FKI-constraints.
Andreas, do you have indexes on FK columns in child tables?
If not – there is your problem.
Вложения
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: