Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment
| От | Andreas Joseph Krogh |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | VisenaEmail.34.343197b56a69f614.1727b47575a@tc7-visena обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment (Jeremy Schneider <schnjere@amazon.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
På onsdag 03. juni 2020 kl. 18:50:12, skrev Jeremy Schneider <schnjere@amazon.com>:
> On 6/2/20 1:30 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> No, nothing does as PG doesn't support it as we have one WAL stream for
>> the entire cluster.
On 6/2/20 11:38, Ron wrote:
> Right. Making WAL files specific to a database should be high on the
> list of priorities.
Did Oracle change this? Last time I looked, I don't think Oracle
supported local redo in their multitenant architecture either.
Regardless of what Oracle does, I agree this would be a huge step in the right direction for pg-DBAs.
I have absolutely no clue about how much work is required etc., but I think it's kind of strange that no companies have invested in making this happen.
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
Andreas Joseph Krogh
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: