Re: [GENERAL] pglogical vs. built-in logical replication in pg-10

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andreas Joseph Krogh
Тема Re: [GENERAL] pglogical vs. built-in logical replication in pg-10
Дата
Msg-id VisenaEmail.17.969f597d04a91a24.15cd0e5d6b1@tc7-visena
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [GENERAL] pglogical vs. built-in logical replication in pg-10  (Achilleas Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com>)
Список pgsql-general
På torsdag 22. juni 2017 kl. 17:10:40, skrev Achilleas Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com>:
[snip]
What's so better in LO's VS bytea? You do a lot updates on the binary data, changing only parts of it?
 
BYTEA really sucks when dealing with large objects and streaming to clients (JDBC). The only solution (I've found) which doesn't explode in memory-usage is using LOs (OIDs). Note that we're dealing with multi-gigabytes objects, which need to be "transactional safe" (hence stored in the DB).
 
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
CTO / Partner - Visena AS
Mobile: +47 909 56 963
 
Вложения

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andreas Joseph Krogh
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] pglogical vs. built-in logical replication in pg-10
Следующее
От: Ray Stell
Дата:
Сообщение: [GENERAL] 10beta1 role