RE: [small patch] Change datatype of ParallelMessagePending from "volatile bool" to "volatile sig_atomic_t"

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com
Тема RE: [small patch] Change datatype of ParallelMessagePending from "volatile bool" to "volatile sig_atomic_t"
Дата
Msg-id TYAPR01MB58669A9EC96AA3078C2CD938F5549@TYAPR01MB5866.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [small patch] Change datatype of ParallelMessagePending from "volatile bool" to "volatile sig_atomic_t"  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Ответы Re: [small patch] Change datatype of ParallelMessagePending from "volatile bool" to "volatile sig_atomic_t"  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
Dear Michael,

> Yeah, at least as of the cancel callback psql_cancel_callback() that
> handle_sigint() would call on SIGINT as this is set by psql.  So it
> does not seem right to use a boolean rather than a sig_atomic_t in
> this case, as well.

PSA fix patch. Note that PromptInterruptContext.enabled was also fixed
because it is substituted from sigint_interrupt_enabled

Best Regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bharath Rupireddy
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Use pg_pwritev_with_retry() instead of write() in dir_open_for_write() to avoid partial writes?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Avoid memory leaks during base backups