Hi Andrey san, Movead san,
From: tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com <tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com>
> While Clock-SI seems to be considered the best promising for global
> serializability here,
>
> * Why does Clock-SI gets so much attention? How did Clock-SI become the
> only choice?
>
> * Clock-SI was devised in Microsoft Research. Does Microsoft or some other
> organization use Clock-SI?
Could you take a look at this patent? I'm afraid this is the Clock-SI for MVCC. Microsoft holds this until 2031. I
couldn'tfind this with the keyword "Clock-SI.""
US8356007B2 - Distributed transaction management for database systems with multiversioning - Google Patents
https://patents.google.com/patent/US8356007
If it is, can we circumvent this patent?
Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa