Dear Alexander, Amit,
> > But tomorrow it could be for other tables and if we change this
> > TRUNCATE logic for pg_largeobject (of which chances are less) then
> > there is always a chance that one misses changing this comment. I feel
> > keeping it generic in this case would be better as the problem is
> > generic but it is currently shown for pg_largeobject.
>
> Yes, for sure. So let's keep it generic as you prefer.
>
> Thank you!
Thanks for working the patch. I'm also OK to push the Amit's fix patch.
Best Regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED