Re: GIN pageinspect support for entry tree and posting tree
| От | Japin Li |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: GIN pageinspect support for entry tree and posting tree |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | SYAPR01MB303853F66A53ED2297560915B68FA@SYAPR01MB3038.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: GIN pageinspect support for entry tree and posting tree (Roman Khapov <rkhapov@yandex-team.ru>) |
| Ответы |
Re: GIN pageinspect support for entry tree and posting tree
Re: GIN pageinspect support for entry tree and posting tree |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 at 17:44, Roman Khapov <rkhapov@yandex-team.ru> wrote: >> I agree — the NULL handling seems wrong. >> Here's a quick patch to fix it. What do you think? > > LGTM, but maybe the test should be expanded with NULL for the two-column > indexes? I mean to add NULLs at zero column too. > Sorry, I’m not sure I understand. Are you suggesting we add one (or both) of these test cases? INSERT INTO test1 VALUES (2, NULL, NULL); INSERT INTO test1 VALUES (2, ARRAY[NULL, 222], ARRAY['d', NULL]); > Also, about the tests but not related to NULLs... > Seems like we need to run those tests on 32bit system, the test output should be different? > Agree. -- Regards, Japin Li ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co., Ltd.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: