Why is the INTERSECT so slow?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dragos Stoichita
Тема Why is the INTERSECT so slow?
Дата
Msg-id SAK.2000.05.16.cbenpjjs@ddd
обсуждение исходный текст
Список pgsql-general
  Hi, I'm a new user to SQL and PostgreSQL so perhaps my questions below will be a little stupid so
please excuse me.

  I do this:

  CREATE TABLE t1 ( PRIMARY KEY (f1), f1 INTEGER, f2 INTEGER);
  CREATE TABLE t2 ( PRIMARY KEY (f1), f1 INTEGER, f2 INTEGER);

  Then I fill each of these tables with say, around 10000 rows.

  When I do:

  SELECT f2 FROM t1 WHERE f1 > 100;

  It is amazingly fast! It takes less than 1 second. And it returns around 3000 rows.

  I do then:

  SELECT f2 FROM t2 WHERE f1 > 100;

  It is also amazingly fast and returns around 4000 rows.

  Then I do:

  SELECT f2 FROM t1 WHERE f1 > 100 INTERSECT SELECT f2 FROM t2 WHERE f1 > 100;

  And it is incredibly *SLOW*!!! I really don't understand, I run postmaster on a 400Mhz pc with 64 megs
of ram. What's happening? It is only an intersection of integers. If I had to do it in C, I would Quicksort
the results from the first query, Quicksort the results from the second query, then unique them, then
intersect them. On a 400 Mhz processor I think it would take less than 1 second. I tested my Quicksort
routines on a Pentium 120 and remembered it sorted more than 100000 integers per second. And a
unique algorithm when the elements are ordered is very fast. The same for an intersection algorithm. But
it takes more than 8 seconds for PostgreSQL to process the INTERSECT.

  Is there an explanation? Is it my fault? Please help me I already switched from another database to this
one and hoped PostgreSQL would perform well :(

  Dragos Stoichita, 19 year old student in electronics at ESIEE (http://www.esiee.fr)




В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Charles Tassell
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Performance
Следующее
От: Lincoln Yeoh
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: rtree indexes aren't being used with 7.0