Re: [HACKERS] rpms
От | Sergio A. Kessler |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] rpms |
Дата | |
Msg-id | SAK.2000.03.03.qobrtjjp@sergio обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] rpms (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] rpms
Re: [HACKERS] rpms |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> el día Thu, 02 Mar 2000 16:38:23 +0000, escribió: >> Why not just name the packages postgresql-server and postgresql-client [...] >That is possible. imho it is solving a "problem" with no clear benefit >in the end, so why bother? Just renaming packages doesn't, by name >alone, clarify which packages depend on others, doesn't clarify that >-server depends on -client, etc etc. sorry to be picky thomas, but if the name has almost no mean (as you imply) then why not call the package "pirindonga" ? anyway, is not a problem for =me=, I know now what the package contains (but I've installed the postgres rpm believing I was installing the server, so count on me as one damnified that ignored that there must be a package named just postgresql). one last thing, usually users don't look at the full description of the package before installing it, they (and I) just do rpm -Uvh xxxxx.rpm (usually the name is self descriptive) sergio
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: