Re: jdbc large object support ??

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Joachim Achtzehnter
Тема Re: jdbc large object support ??
Дата
Msg-id Pine.WNT.4.21.0007191355090.148-100000@van4
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: jdbc large object support ??  (John Thorhauer <jthorhauer@phoenixcolor.com>)
Список pgsql-interfaces
On Wed, 19 Jul 2000, John Thorhauer wrote:
>
> Joachim Achtzehnter wrote:
> >
> > Take a look at the mailing list archive. This question was discussed in
> > great detail during the last couple of days. You use setBytes() and
> > getBytes() instead of streams, for details see the archive.
> >
>
> OK.  I looked at that and I saw someone mention something about using
> the text type to store data.  What I am doing is trying to store xml
> files in postgres.

Was not referring to the use of the text type, but rather to the lengthy
discussion about how one can use Postgresql large objects via JDBC. Just
read all of yesterday's messages with "setBytes" or "Blob" in the subject
line. This was all about large object (BLOB) support.

Joachim




В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: John Thorhauer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: jdbc large object support ??
Следующее
От: Joseph Shraibman
Дата:
Сообщение: Cursors and JDBC