Re: pg_restore new option -m

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От ohp@pyrenet.fr
Тема Re: pg_restore new option -m
Дата
Msg-id Pine.UW2.4.63.0902191700150.125@sun.pyrenet
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_restore new option -m  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, Tom Lane wrote:

> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:05:32 -0500
> From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> To: ohp@pyrenet.fr
> Cc: pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_restore new option -m 
> 
> ohp@pyrenet.fr writes:
>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> You sure you don't get exactly the same without -m?
>>>
>> yes!
>
> We're going to need to see the test case then.
>
>             regards, tom lane
>
they were included in the last mail :)
-- 
Olivier PRENANT                    Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work)
15, Chemin des Monges                +33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax)
31190 AUTERIVE                       +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM)
FRANCE                          Email: ohp@pyrenet.fr
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Make your life a dream, make your dream a reality. (St Exupery)


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Euler Taveira de Oliveira
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: autovacuum not honoring pg_autovacuum in 8.3.5?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Doubts about EvalPlanQual