Re: ALTER INDEX OWNER TO
От | ohp@pyrenet.fr |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ALTER INDEX OWNER TO |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.UW2.4.53.0508151657110.12006@sun.pyrenet обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ALTER INDEX OWNER TO (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
pg_dump is STILL emiting alter index. ISTM we shou make it a warning AND remove it from pg_dump Regards On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Tom Lane wrote: > Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 09:54:12 -0400 > From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> > To: ohp@pyrenet.fr > Cc: pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] ALTER INDEX OWNER TO > > ohp@pyrenet.fr writes: > > It seems that ALTER INDEX foo OWNER TO bar; doesn't work anymore. > > The error is foo is not a table or a view. > > Yeah, I suppressed that alternative a few weeks ago, thinking that it > was not sensible since we don't really support having indexes owned > by anyone except the owner of the parent table. Not sure what to do > about the fact that pg_dump has been emitting it though. Maybe reduce > the error to a warning, and make it a no-op? > > regards, tom lane > > -- Olivier PRENANT Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work) 15, Chemin des Monges +33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax) 31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM) FRANCE Email: ohp@pyrenet.fr ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Make your life a dream, make your dream a reality. (St Exupery)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: