Re: [GENERAL] date_part bug?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Oleg Broytmann
Тема Re: [GENERAL] date_part bug?
Дата
Msg-id Pine.SOL2.3.96.SK.981218113753.5955A-100000@sun.med.ru
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: [GENERAL] date_part bug?  ("Oliver Elphick" <olly@lfix.co.uk>)
Список pgsql-general
Hello!

On Thu, 17 Dec 1998, Tim Williams wrote:
> When I run the following set of statements in postgres v6.4 (built on
> Debian Linux):
>
> create table tmp (v1 date, v2 datetime);
> insert into tmp values ('06-01-1999', '06-01-1999');
> select date_part('month', v1) as m1, date_part('month', v2) as m2 from
> tmp;
>
> I see the following results:
>
> m1|m2
> --+--
>  5| 6
> (1 row)
>
> Why is date_part giving different results for date and date_time?  Why
> is it wrong for 'date'? Anybody seen this before?

   I tried this and it works pretty good for me on Solaris.
   It looks like an error in postgres on glibc2-based linux platform. It is
discussing now on pgsql-hackers list. The solution is not ready yet. I am
working on this with a good deal of help from other people...

Oleg.
----
  Oleg Broytmann     http://members.tripod.com/~phd2/     phd2@earthling.net
           Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Oliver Elphick"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] Why PostgreSQL is better than other commerial softwares?
Следующее
От: Anton de Wet
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] Why PostgreSQL is better than other commerial softwares?