Re: [HACKERS] psql
От | Nailah Ogeer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] psql |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.SOL.4.33.0306201328310.4641-100000@innovate обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] psql (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] psql
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Well here's the thing. Before i was trying to use ShmemInitStruct in buf_init.c. The problem with this is that you can't shrink or grow shared memory. That is why i switched over and just used malloc. So i seem to be in a big dilemma, on one hand, if i use malloc, i can't keep this info i need; and on the other if i use shmeminitstruct then i can't shrink or grow the BP clusters. But i will try to test your hypothesis to see if shared memory will take care of this. On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Tom Lane wrote: > Nailah Ogeer <ogeer@cs.queensu.ca> writes: > > So what is happening is that i enter the relation ids into the BP cluster > > linked list fine and every time i call psql, it automatically deletes. > > Sounds to me like you are trying to keep stuff in backend-local memory > that needs to be in shared memory. > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: