On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Added to TODO:
>
> * Allow WAL information to recover corrupted pg_controldata
>...
> > Using pg_control to get the checkpoint position speeds up the
> > recovery process, but to handle possible corruption of pg_control,
> > we should actually implement the reading of existing log segments
> > in reverse order -- newest to oldest -- in order to find the last
> > checkpoint. This has not been implemented, yet.
So if you do this, do you still need to store that information in
pg_control at all?
cjs
--
Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're
alllight. --XTC