Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Curt Sampson
Тема Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
Дата
Msg-id Pine.NEB.4.44.0209251005330.9181-100000@angelic.cynic.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?  (Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>)
Ответы Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?  ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Jan Wieck wrote:

> And AFAICS it is scary only because screwing that up will simply corrupt
> your database. Thus, a simple random number (okay, and a timestamp of
> initdb) in two files, one in $PGDATA and one in $PGXLOG would be a
> totally sufficient safety mechanism to prevent starting with the wrong
> XLOG directory.

But still, why set up a situation where your database might not
start? Why not set it up so that if you get just *one* environment
or command-line variable right, you can't set another inconsistently
and screw up your start anyway? Why store configuration information
outside of the database data directory in a form that's not easily
backed up, and not easily found by other utilities?

It's almost like people *don't* want to put this in the config file
or something....

cjs
-- 
Curt Sampson  <cjs@cynic.net>   +81 90 7737 2974   http://www.netbsd.org   Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're
alllight.  --XTC
 



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: DROP COLUMN misbehaviour with multiple inheritance
Следующее
От: John Buckman
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Postgresql Automatic vacuum