On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> The "no envar" camp has not thought through the issues yet, though the
> issues can be found in the threads. Better to decide what the
> requirements are before throwing out the solution.
Ok, so what issues has the "no envvar" camp not yet dealt with? What's
missing in that patch posted here a while back to specify your data
files in the configuration file? (Presumably we'd just add the log file
to that in a similar way.)
cjs
--
Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're
alllight. --XTC