Re: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof
От | Oleg Bartunov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.64.1102041845260.31836@sn.sai.msu.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | CommitFest progress - or lack thereof (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof
(Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert, I don't see btree_gist with knn-support. I'm afraid it'll be forgotten. Oleg On Fri, 4 Feb 2011, Robert Haas wrote: > With ten days left in the current CommitFest, being the last > CommitFest for 9.1 development, there are presently 40 patches that > are marked either Needs Review or Waiting on Author. The 11 patches > that are Waiting on Author are the following: > > Synchronous Replication, transaction-controlled > Recovery Control > SQL/MED - postgresql_fdw > FDW API > Skip validation of Foreign Keys > Self-tuning checkpoint sync spread > PL/Python explicit subtransactions > keeping timestamp of the lasts stats reset > Named restore points > pg_stat_activity.client_hostname field > log_csv_fields ; add current_role log option > > If you are the author of one of these patches, you need to post an > updated patch ASAP, or wait for 9.2. A number of these patches have > been sitting for WEEKS without an update. When you post your updated > patch (or if by chance you already did), please add a link to the > CommitFest application and change the status to Needs Review. Many of > these patches likely still need a few more rounds of review before > they are committed. If you wait until February 14th at 11:59pm to > update them, they're not going to make it in. > > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view/inprogress > > As for the patches that are marked Needs Review, some people have put > their names into the CommitFest application, indicating their intent > and commitment to review particular patches, and then have not done > so. If you are one of those people, please post your review to the > list and update the CommitFest application. If you are a reviewer who > has completed all of the reviewing you've previously signed up for, > and still want to do more, please consider jumping in on one of the > patches that still needs review, and help move the discussion along. > Even if you cannot do a full review, please review as much as you can > and post your feedback to the list. We need to determine which of > these patches are viable candidates for 9.2 and which are not. If you > are a patch author and your patch is marked as needing review, please > double-check that it still applies and has not bitrotted, and verify > that you have responded to all feedback previously given, so that if > someone has time to review your patch they can do so productively. > > Thanks, > > Regards, Oleg _____________________________________________________________ Oleg Bartunov, Research Scientist, Head of AstroNet (www.astronet.ru), Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University, Russia Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/ phone: +007(495)939-16-83, +007(495)939-23-83
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: