Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres
| От | Joshua_Kramer |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.64.0708081338550.13447@home-av-server.home-av обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres (Lukas Kahwe Smith <smith@pooteeweet.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres
|
| Список | pgsql-advocacy |
> I do think this language harms PostgreSQL because it makes it sound like > previously it was only available in unprofessional packaging, which implies Erg, I have a dumb question. What does this package provide over and above the standard PG .msi's available for Windows? Is it merely a consistency so that Linux newbies can get an easy Postgres package too? I'm just wondering. I would beleive that those inclined to develop using MySQL would also be inclined to develop under Windows - I didn't find it difficult at all to install PG 8.2.4 or pgAdminIII on my C5 boxes... Cheers, -J
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: