Re: Performance issues of one vs. two split tables.
| От | Rich Shepard |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Performance issues of one vs. two split tables. |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.64.0705141358120.6830@salmo.appl-ecosys.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Performance issues of one vs. two split tables. (PFC <lists@peufeu.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 14 May 2007, PFC wrote: > I did something like that on MySQL some time ago. > In the Users table there was stuff that other users need to see (like > his login name, etc), and stuff that only this user needs to see (like his > preferences). > So, when displaying posts in the forum, for instance, only a small > part of the fields in the Users table was needed, the rest was just dead > weight, that made the table unable to fit in RAM. > So I split the table, and it was faster. > > However, you can also buy more RAM... Or, use Views without paying more. Rich -- Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D. | The Environmental Permitting Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc. | Accelerator(TM) <http://www.appl-ecosys.com> Voice: 503-667-4517 Fax: 503-667-8863
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: