Re: tsearch_core for inclusion
От
Oleg Bartunov
Тема
Re: tsearch_core for inclusion
Дата
Msg-id
Pine.LNX.4.64.0703160939410.400@sn.sai.msu.ru
Ответ на
Re: tsearch_core for inclusion (Magnus Hagander)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
tsearch_core for inclusion Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>
Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
Re: tsearch_core for inclusion "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: tsearch_core for inclusion "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: tsearch_core for inclusion "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>
Re: tsearch_core for inclusion "Florian G. Pflug" <fgp@phlo.org>
Re: tsearch_core for inclusion "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>
Re: tsearch_core for inclusion "Florian G. Pflug" <fgp@phlo.org>
Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>
Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>
Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>
Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>
Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
Re: tsearch_core for inclusion "Florian G. Pflug" <fgp@phlo.org>
Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>
Re: tsearch_core for inclusion "Magnus Hagander" <magnus@hagander.net>
Re: tsearch_core for inclusion Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Magnus Hagander wrote: >>> Most people whom I talk to about tsearch who want the syntax changed to make >>> it easier want something akin to just "CREATE INDEX fti1 on t1(c1) USING >>> FULLTEXT" and then be done with it. This patch isn't going to give people >>> that. >> >> Since we use standard postgresql-ish CREATE INDEX command, I assume >> people want to skip creation of tsvector column ? > > That would be great. > >> How they could manage >> complex document indexing, when document is a combination (with different weights) >> of many text attributes from several tables, for example ? > > Just to give you some more work, could I have both, please. > > Seriously, if the current powerful functionality could be combined with a dead simple solution for new users and those who don't need it, that would be very > good. > > This could be an auto generated hidden column or something, as long as the user doesn't need to see or care about it in the simple case. hmm, then we should think about very generic fts configuration behind such simple solution. We need to know what requirements and features should be supported. for example, "CREATE INDEX fti1 on t1(c1) USING FULLTEXT" syntax assume default configuration only. Joshua, Tome proposed something like CREATE INDEX fti1 on t1(c1) USING FULLTEXT [WITH] GIST | GIN, so is't worth to extend it to specify fts configuration like CREATE INDEX fti1 on t1(c1) USING FULLTEXT [public.pg] [WITH] GIST | GIN Normally, fts configuration is used when creating tsvector, so CREATE INDEX doesn't need to know it. Hmm, looks rather messy. Regards, Oleg _____________________________________________________________ Oleg Bartunov, Research Scientist, Head of AstroNet (www.astronet.ru), Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University, Russia Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/ phone: +007(495)939-16-83, +007(495)939-23-83
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления