Re: replication choices
От | Ben |
---|---|
Тема | Re: replication choices |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.64.0702061624110.28404@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: replication choices (Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Just to be clear, this effectively means I double my database writes, correct? On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 03:17:40PM -0800, Ben wrote: >> the remote sites back to the central site, each remote site needs to have >> a normal slony node first, which I don't have the hardware for. > > An answer for this, though a dirty kludge, is to replicate to another > database in the same cluster. This is really no more load than the > single replication user, although it is expensive at the disk level. > > A > > -- > Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca > The fact that technology doesn't work is no bar to success in the marketplace. > --Philip Greenspun > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org/ >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: