Re: Hardware
| От | Ben |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Hardware |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.64.0702061124360.28404@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Hardware (Walter Vaughan <wvaughan@steelerubber.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Walter Vaughan wrote: > <quote> > CPUs ? The more CPUs the better, however if your database does not use many > complex functions your money is best spent on a better disk subsystem. Also, > avoid Intel Xeon processors with PostgreSQL as there is a problem with the > context switching in these processors that gives sub-par performance. > Opterons are generally accepted as being a superior CPU for PostgreSQL > databases. > </quote> > > Is this still true in regards to Xeon's? I was looking at a server with Quad > Core Xeon 2 5335 @ 2.0GHz. My understanding is that this is no longer true with the newer xeons, but then, I haven't tested them myself, so I can't say.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: