Re: Postgres Replication
От | Ben |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres Replication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.64.0701091416590.8626@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Postgres Replication ("dcrespo" <dcrespo@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgres Replication
|
Список | pgsql-general |
If you only want to use one database at a time you might look into using DRBD. It's a linux block-level package that is like raid-1 over the network. On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, dcrespo wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I have two computers with a Postgres Database each. I want one of them > to be the replica of the other one; let's say I want a Master to Master > replication in order to use either one (but only one at a time) as the > main database: in case of failure, switch. The ideal synchronization > way would be Synchronous. However, these two computers are going to be > next to each other, so the asynchronous synchronization would be fast > enough (I don't really know. Can you tell so?) for the case synchronous > sync is not available. > > What I have found so far is Daffodil and Slony-I. Daffodil's name > doesn't even appear in Postgresql.org, which is not the case for > Slony-I. So there's a big point in favor to Slony-I. > > Has anybody researched on this that can point me in the right > direction? > > Thanks a lot, > > Daniel Crespo > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: