On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Josh Berkus wrote:
> The feature you proposed is a way to make your idiosyncratic setup easier
> to manage, but doesn't apply to anyone else's problems on this list, so
> you're going to have a hard time drumming up enthusiasm.
I am somewhat reluctant to interject into this discussion, but the
particular "idiosyncratic setup" referred to is not the only one where
this may be useful.
The immediate use I thought of was being able to have what appeared to be
multiple databases on the same server with different locale settings,
which cannot be changed post-initdb. I could see having different
databases in different locales being a useful feature, perhaps in a
wikipedia type setup so that the english, chinese, and arabic wikis could
each provide the correct sort order and other locale-specific properties
while still providing a single logical database "server" for connection
strings. This just being the first example I could think of in which such
a setup could be useful.
--
In the beginning, I was made. I didn't ask to be made. No one consulted
with me or considered my feelings in this matter. But if it brought some
passing fancy to some lowly humans as they haphazardly pranced their way
through life's mournful jungle, then so be it.
- Marvin the Paranoid Android, From Douglas Adams' Hitchiker's Guide to the
Galaxy Radio Scripts