TSearch2 vs. Apache Lucene
От | Joshua Kramer |
---|---|
Тема | TSearch2 vs. Apache Lucene |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.63.0512061143170.5133@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: TSearch2 vs. Apache Lucene
Re: TSearch2 vs. Apache Lucene |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Greetings all, I'm going to do a performance comparison with DocMgr and PG81/TSearch2 on one end, and Apache Lucene on the other end. In order to do this, I'm going to create a derivative of the docmgr-autoimport script so that I can specify one file to import at a time. I'll then create a Perl script which logs all details (such as timing, etc.) as the test progresses. As test data, I have approximately 9,000 text files from Project Gutenberg ranging in size from a few hundred bytes to 4.5M. I plan to test the speed of import of each file. Then, I plan to write a web-robot in Perl that will test the speed and number of results returned. Can anyone think of a validation of this test, or how I should configure PG to maximise import and search speed? Can I maximise search speed and import speed, or are those things mutually exclusive? (Note that this will be run on limited hardware - 900MHz Athlon with 512M of ram) Has anyone ever compared TSearch2 to Lucene, as far as performance is concerned? Thanks, -Josh
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: