> I just want the system to remove the 102, since it is of no use.
I understood that.
> As I said, I haven't thought about it in-depth, but keeping the permissio=
ns
> with the numeric user is a bad idea.
It is only a bad idea if the same numerical user id is reused. If not,=20
this is not really a problem. It is not beautiful, but it does not harm.
>> So it looks much simpler to fix the real issue by avoiding the userid to
>> be reused. The dandling permission cost is low.
>
> Would this keep the old permissions on the objects?
Yes, but no user would take it, so that would not be a security issue.
> Something like select relname from pg_class where relacl similar to=20
> '[0-9]+=3D' would be sufficient.
Yep. Not with this very regexpr (think of user "tp01"), but something
like that could work, indeed.
--=20
Fabien COELHO _ http://www.cri.ensmp.fr/~coelho _ Fabien.Coelho@ensmp.fr
CRI-ENSMP, 35, rue Saint-Honor=E9, 77305 Fontainebleau cedex, France
phone: (+33|0) 1 64 69 {voice: 48 52, fax: 47 09, standard: 47 08}
________ All opinions expressed here are mine _________