Re: question on serial key

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Brandon Metcalf
Тема Re: question on serial key
Дата
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.58L.0905220904060.17654@cedar.geronimoalloys.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: question on serial key  (Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: question on serial key  (Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman@gmail.com>)
Re: question on serial key  ("Roderick A. Anderson" <raanders@cyber-office.net>)
Список pgsql-general
g == gryzman@gmail.com writes:

 g> you should use it, whenever you need db to keep its own key internally.
 g> Advantage of sequence is also the fact, that you can have the sequence
 g> value used on different columns/tables .

 g> My rule of thumb is , in that case: as long as it is a short type (not
 g> of toastable, or/and variable length), and as long as it won't change,
 g> and is unique - I can use it. Otherwise, I use sequence to connect
 g> rows internally for database.
 g> First rule, is because of index access, and the way btree works.
 g> Second is, because update of value will update other rows too - and
 g> HOT won't help you here, so that's not efficient. And also, forcing it
 g> to be unique is harder than.

 g> Hth.

That does help.  So, in my example of a table consisting of rows for
each periodic table element, the atomic number would suffice as a
unique key since, well, it's unique and not going to change.  Right?

--
Brandon

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: question on serial key
Следующее
От: Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: question on serial key