On Sun, 8 Jan 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Why is this a good idea?
>
"In spirit of incremental improvement":
(1) The spinlock itself are light weight than the LWLock here and we can
reduce the lock contention a little bit in AbsorbFsyncRequests();
(2) Don't need the CRITICAL SECTION in AbsorbFsyncRequests() any more;
Regards,
Qingqing