Stephan Szabo writes:
> It's a constraint name. IIRC, it happens to affect all such named
> constraints currently. We should probably allow <tablename>.<constraint>
> (and <schema>.<tablename>.<constraint>) as well. Too late for 7.4, but
> this can happen for 7.5 if there aren't any objections.
I object.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net