Tom Lane writes:
> "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
> > I notice you can use the 'DROP TYPE' syntax to drop a domain. Should that
> > be allowed?
>
> Why not? A domain *is* a type, by any reasonable test.
According to that logic, a view is a table, but we still require DROP VIEW
to drop a view.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net