On Tue, 26 Jul 2005, Neil Conway wrote:
> Neil Conway wrote:
> > Not at the moment. I believe we have agreed that it would be better to
> > remove the concept of "exception variables" and just use strings, but I
> > haven't implemented this yet.
>
> BTW, one minor annoyance I noticed: a builtin condition name can
> actually map to multiple SQLSTATE values.
can you show sample, please?
If we allow a builtin
> condition name to be specified to RAISE, this means we'll actually need
> to pass around a list of SQLSTATE values that are thrown by the RAISE,
> rather than a single SQLSTATE. This seems pretty ugly, though --
> especially considering that only a handful of the builtin condition
> names actually do map to multiple SQLSTATEs. Does anyone have a better
> suggestion?
>
Exception variables can solve it, but its dead concept. We can have list
of prohibited condition names and for its throw compile error
condition name is ambigous
Pavel
> -Neil
>