Re: set returning function

On Mon, 9 May 2005, Tom Lane wrote:

> > Bug?
>
> Unimplemented feature.

Is

   SELECT 42, srf();

the same as

   SELECT 42, * FROM srf();

?

In my view the first version is an error. It's not like you can put a
normal table in the select list, so why can we put a set returning
function there? Ie, is it really a feature?

--
/Dennis Björklund