Re: fork/exec patch

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dennis Bjorklund
Тема Re: fork/exec patch
Дата
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0312150027550.10157-100000@zigo.dhs.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: fork/exec patch  (Claudio Natoli <claudio.natoli@memetrics.com>)
Список pgsql-patches
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003, Claudio Natoli wrote:

> Moreover, in general, how do we handle things like this? IMHO, I'd rather
> live with a few kludges (that don't impact the *nix code) until the Windows
> port is actually a reality

As long as it does not hurt the unix code it's not a big problem as I see
it. The usual open source solution is that since no one else writes the
code, you can do it the way you think works the best. To change this in
the future does not mean that everything else has to be rewritten which is
good.

It does also not mean that one can not discuss the implementation. A fair
amount of discussion is always good.

--
/Dennis


В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Claudio Natoli
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: fork/exec patch
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: fork/exec patch