Re: SCSI vs. IDE performance test

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Ben
Тема
Re: SCSI vs. IDE performance test
Дата
Msg-id
Pine.LNX.4.44.0311261402080.7403-100000@localhost.localdomain
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: S.M.A.R.T. hard drives WAS: SCSI vs. IDE performance test Randolf Richardson <rr@8x.ca>
Base-two artihmetic sounds pretty broad. If only you could come up with a
scheme for division and multiplication by powers of two through
bitshifting.....

On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Tom Lane wrote:

> Randolf Richardson  writes:
> >> They've managed to patent ye olde elevator algorithm??  The USPTO really
> >> is without a clue, isn't it :-(
> 
> >     	It's not the USPTO's fault -- the problem is that nobody objected to it
> > while it was in the "Patent Pending" state.
> 
> If their examiner had even *minimal* competency in the field, it would
> not have gotten to the "Patent Pending" state.  Algorithms that are well
> documented in the standard textbooks of thirty years ago do not qualify
> as something people should have to stand guard against.
> 
> Perhaps I should try to patent base-two arithmetic, and hope no one
> notices till it goes through ... certainly the USPTO won't notice ...
> 
> 			regards, tom lane
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>       subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
>       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
> 


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Index on array element
От: Martijn van Oosterhout
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: postgres metadata
FAQ