Re: Build farm
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Build farm |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.44.0311191912530.21224-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Build farm (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Build farm
Re: Build farm |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan writes: > Maybe it wouldn't be of great value to PostgreSQL. And maybe it would. I > have an open mind about it. I don't think incompleteness is an argument > against it, though. If you want to do it, by all means go for it. I'm sure it would give everyone a fuzzy feeling to see the green lights everywhere. But realistically, don't expect any significant practical benefits, such cutting beta time by 10%. The Samba build daemon suite is pretty good. We have a couple of those hosts in our office in fact. (I think they're building PostgreSQL regularly as well.) A tip: You might find that adopting the source code of the Samba suite to PostgreSQL is harder than writing a new one. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: