Re: Release cycle length
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Release cycle length |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.44.0311180329330.639-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Release cycle length ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Release cycle length
Re: Release cycle length |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Marc G. Fournier writes: > Right now, I believe we are looking at an April 1st beta, and a May 1st > related ... those are, as always, *tentative* dates that will become more > fine-tuned as those dates become nearer ... OK, here start the problems. Development already started, so April 1st is already 5 months development. Add 1 month because no one is willing to hold people to these dates. So that's 6 months. Then for 6 months of development, you need at least 2 months of beta. So we're already in the middle of July, everyone is on vacation, and we'll easily reach the 9 months -- instead of 6. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: